schrodingerscockroach: (Default)
Agent Washington ([personal profile] schrodingerscockroach) wrote in [community profile] auroraexpress2019-09-11 09:58 pm

(no subject)

Who: OPEN
When: Day 41, Afternoon
Where: Wherever

[Tis a mingle. Go henceforth and socialize.]
bowtiedbones: (93)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-24 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, basically the important thing is that these guys weren't in a glacial area, at least not their hosts.
bowtiedbones: (52)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-25 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
[going back over to the deer]

Host means their bones. They're both made of an conglomeration of soul fragments that may or may not include the original residing soul, but regardless they hold no specific memory of any of their past lives except for what's instinctive or held in common between the pieces. Isolde and Isildur are effectively new, independent beings.
bowtiedbones: (22)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-26 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
[picking up the red chalk and getting one of the many many white pieces just scattered around her lab to make some quick markings on the deer. dotted "cut here" lines in white and more arcane symbols in red.]

I have some theories that could have played a role in their effectiveness of their bindings and the success I've had with calling them long-distance as ghosts, but when I cast their initial summonings I didn't set a focus for any particular soul or group of souls. I do an open broadband casting that's species-limited, of course, but otherwise will collect from any location or age so long as the power levels and the cooperativity balance out.
bowtiedbones: (32)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-26 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I call it a ghost when I summon Isildur independent of his bones, but the whole sort of... lingering spirit of the deceased idea of a ghost? That's not really much of a thing outside of ER necromancy. Our souls begin decaying very quickly, and you need a really particular set of skills to engage a haunting, and even then most methods are suuuuper frowned up upon now.
bowtiedbones: (53)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-26 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
It's inhumane. Can you lift the deer by its legs for me?
bowtiedbones: (3)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-26 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Ten to twelve-thousand years is my upper limit, and that really needs a quality specimen and my familiars' support. I haven't tested my limits with distance to that extreme a degree, since the cost of the flight to a closer summoning location would be worth the reduction in risk. Even being a few hundred miles out of their original range can add a lot of difficulty, and that really stacks when it's something extinct... Like I can summon a common pigeon with really no effort at all. There's more time spent drawing the circle than there is on the calling. But a teratorn takes hours and hours.

[without breaking a beat as she starts on disemboweling the deer]
Edited 2019-09-26 04:09 (UTC)
bowtiedbones: (22)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-09-30 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[piling the organs into a bin to the side and shooing away her suddenly VERY interested familiars. they may be skeletons but instincts want those snacks.]

No, greedy butts, you'll make a mess. Later— Teratornithidae is a family of extinct vulture relatives. Rocs are bigger, but for non-magical animals, they were some of the biggest flighted birds around. If not the biggest! I've been working with one for a locomotion study, since there's still some work to be done on figuring out how exactly they got airborne and how agile they were on the ground.
bowtiedbones: (79)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-10-01 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, I have neither the loaned teratorn skeleton, the notes, the cameras, nor the motion-tracking computer programs with me. I do a lot of work where I summon something so it can participate in someone else's study.
bowtiedbones: (53)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-10-02 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
No? If your soul is getting involved in a standard summoning, you've messed up badly.
bowtiedbones: (22)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-10-02 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
Generally, yes! My familiars are a somewhat confusing case since they are necromantic summons, but they serve a very different role than other creatures I summon, skeleton or otherwise.
bowtiedbones: (32)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-10-02 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
You do get some, since dead creatures technically have a magic flow after you've gone and raised them up, but most familiars are going to be live magical animals, like one of my friends has a white dog for hers. Monsters, or magical beasts, like unicorns and griffons also work. Mine qualify both for being dragons and for being dead.
bowtiedbones: (60)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones 2019-10-02 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
[both of the dragons swing their heads up to glare at Dusk, spiky hackles raised and bristling. eliza's smile wavers.]

Um, it would be, but that's not really a factor we need to consider. There's protections for familiars.

(no subject)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones - 2019-10-02 01:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones - 2019-10-02 02:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones - 2019-10-02 02:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones - 2019-10-07 19:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones - 2019-10-20 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] bowtiedbones - 2019-10-21 03:55 (UTC) - Expand